Spaceship One Flights - Spaceship One Flights Questions

"Spaceship One Flights - Spaceship One Flights Questions"

Menu

Spaceship One Questions

Spaceship One Flights

Links

Search Google
Find anything your looking for at Google.com

Question #1:

interesting question, read it till the end...?

if we use a spaceship which goes faster than the speed of light, and we get away from the earth, than the light reflected from the earth which we see from the distance would be the look of the earth one moment ago, or even before we took the flight (for the proper distance and speed) so we can see how the earth looked like in the past, what do you think, is it possible?

Question #2:

long question, read it till the end...?

Question #3:

Time Travel....Speed of Light?

I'm sorry, my fellow geniuses; something does not compute.
I posted a question about a simple explanation of why time "slows up" (supposedly) and all I got were "sound bites" from the different books published purporting to explain the phenomenon.
I can quote verbatim also....that's not what I was looking for.
(It reminds me of the pre-supersonic flights when there were dire forecasts of absolutely horrible things which would happen to an aircraft passing the sound barrier. Of course all the naysayers turned out to be full of baloney.)

My scenario included a "stationary observer".....for time comparison purposes. So, one genius writes in that there is no such thing as a stationary platform......duh.
Let me try again:
Using the familiar "spaceship with a big window" that the stationary observer may look in to, we are to understand (while the stationary observer's clock is marking real time) that those aboard the spaceship are "moving very slowly"..hardly at all......and a 2 year voyage (by the observer's timepiece) shows just a few minutes on the spaceship's timepiece.
And THAT is supposed to explain it all?

1. Aside from the light ray anomalies and vision difficulties at the speed of light, why are the spacemen moving slowly? (they APPEAR to be moving slowly)

2. Why is the timepiece onboard the spaceship moving so slowly?

3. Again, the observer is there as a REAL TIME reference...he is the timekeeper at the Indy 500, let's say.....I'm sure the drivers have their own concept of time, but that doesn't count much for the checkered flag.

So, anybody out there (aside from the parrots quoting paragraphs from Einstein's book) care to take
another crack at it?
Attn: Starski

Can you tell me why it is so many Top Contributors are suffering from diarrhea of the mouth?
Quote: "If you're incapable of understanding answers, don't ask questions"
Is this what you tell your high school algebra class?

Question #4:

top spaceflight achievements?

top 16 space achievements:

16) USA Mariner 9 - First orbit of another planet(Mars). November 13, 1971.

15) USA STS 1 Columbia - First Semi-Reuseable space vehicle. April 14, 1981.

14) USA/ESA/Russia/Japan - International Space Station. First occupied October 31, 2000.

13) USA Skylab 1 - First Semi-perminent space habitat. occupied from 25 May 1973 to 8 February 1974.

12) USA Mars Exploration Rover - seven years of driving around another planet and counting!

11) USA/ESA/ASI Casssini Huygens- First to orbit Saturn, first to land on titan. 5 years in orbit around Saturn and counting!

10) USSR Vega 1 - The Venus balloon floated for over 10 hours and intercepted Halleys Comet to boot! 11 June 1985.

9) USA Viking 1/2 - First unmanned soft landing on Mars. Landed 20 July 1976/3 September 1976.

8) USSR Verena 7 - the first man-made probe to transmit data from the surface of Venus, 15 December 1970.

7) USA Voyager 1/2 - First to flyby uranus and neptune, First to reach the Heliosphere.

6) USA/ESA - Great Observatories. Hubble Space Telescope, Compton Gamma Ray Observatory, Chandra X-ray Observatory,Spitzer Space Telescope. Contribution to our view of the universe.

5) USA Surveyor 1 - First unmanned soft landing on another celestial body. Landed june 2, 1966.

4) USA Pioneer 10/11 - First to leave terrestrial space, first to leave the solar system, first to flyby jupiter and saturn.

3) USSR Vostok 1 - First man in space/ First man to orbit, YUri Gagarin. April 12 1961.

2) USSR Sputnik 1 - First artificial satellite. Reached orbit october 4, 1957.

1) USA Apollo 11 - First manned landing on another celestial body. Landed july 20, 1969.

Additional Details
David A, thanks for the correction on the first soft landing on the moon, and incidentally, of course Im biased, ITS MY LIST, MY OPINION! opinions by nature are biased. My criteria for achievement is a combination of results, success, and innovation in relation to contemporary programs of the same time period.

Dr Goddards liquid fuel rocket is a key milestone in rocketry but at the time spaceflight did not exist, therefore its not an achievement in spaceflight.

Spaceship one is a great technological achevement for a non government entity, however the real hurdle to spaceflight is velocity, not altitude. going mach 25 at 200mi alt (like vostok 1) is an exponentially more difficult achievement than going 60miles vertical at mach 3. granted its a private company but its almost half a century later! and not close in altitude and velocity. Incedintally the second flight was very close to departure. Binnie admitted that he couldn't control the roll rate until he ent decent config.
2 hours ago

Cassini-Huygens. well, thats an opinion. as a modern probe its definately a "GREAT" program, but do really think it surpasses voyager, the great observatories, the first spacecraft, the first to reach the gas giants. consider the time period. sure cassini-huygens is more impressive than pioneer but you have to factor in the expectations of the time.
2 hours ago

Mars Pathfinder- great mission considering the time since we were on mars prior. Sojourner wasnt the first unmanned rover. I gave the MER the nod because of the amount of data returned and the length of the research mission.
2 hours ago

Gimini- an evolution of mercury. hammered out essensial spacefaring methods and tehniques required for the moon landing. Evolutionary but not revolutionary.
2 hours ago

X-15- Absolutely awesome aerospace program. Produced the "immortal" Neil Armstrong. Just like Spaceship 1 it barely qualifies as spacefaring. 62 miles up at mach 6 is amazing but it dosnt compare to 200 miles at mach 25. theres a reason why alan shepherd isnt on the list. Its barely spaceflight! it qualifies as spaceflight but barely, how is this a great spaceflight achievemt?
2 hours ago

Tiros-1 - kind onf obscure. imo i would go with Syncom 2 (1963) as one of the greatest achievements in launch percision. the first sattellite to reach geosynchronus orbit. In my opinion mounting a camera on a payload 450mi alt dosn't really match the achievement of stationing one at 26000mi. Although milestones of spaceflight, i didnt include either because i consider them both evelutionary developments..
2 hours ago

A really cool thing about the STS if that id could land at almost any major airport in the world (depending on orbital inclination). Not that it would, but it could. (and roll up to the terminal) :-P
You gotta admit, thats pretty cool!
2 hours ago

Dave A, maybe you should make your own list before criticising mine. Once you make your list then we can debate.
;-)
1 second

Question #5:

Spaceship games like X-Wing vs Tie Fighter?

Ok I absolutely love these spaceship games where you fly an aircraft and try to destroy other aircraft. What games are out there that are like that? Even games like flight simulator but I would like to have battles in them. It needs to be for pc and I'd like newer ones if possible. Just please give me a list and a link. Thanks

Question #6:

Have you heard about the Astronaut that wants scientist's to test his underwear!?

I think ewww!

The story down below or here's the link if you want to read it from the source: Click Here

In what might embarrass less adventurous souls, astronaut Koichi Wakata is returning to Earth with the underwear he used during his 4-1/2-month space station stay so scientists can check them out.

Warning to researchers: He kept them on for a month at a stretch.

They're experimental high-tech undies, designed in Japan to be odour free.

The Japanese astronaut described his space underwear test Thursday as shuttle Endeavour and its crew aimed for a touchdown the next morning. The astronauts released some mini satellites, their final job before Friday's re-entry, and said it was time to come home after more than two weeks aloft.

"I haven't talked about this underwear to my crew members," Wakata said in an interview with The Associated Press, drawing a big laugh from his six shuttle colleagues.

"But I wore them for about a month, and my station crew members never complained for about a month, so I think the experiment went fine."

The underwear, called J-Wear, is a new type of anti-bacterial, water-absorbent, odour-eliminating clothing designed for space missions. The line includes shirts, pants and socks as well. Wakata tested all of them during his mission; he had four pairs of the silver-coated underwear, a cross between briefs and boxers.

"We'll see the results after landing," Wakata said.

J-Wear is billed as being antistatic and flame retardant, which is especially important for spaceship wear. The cotton and polyester clothes are also seamless, making them lighter and more comfortable, according to the Japanese Space Agency. The goal is "comfortable everyday clothes for life in a spaceship."

Another Japanese astronaut wore some J-Wear items during a shuttle flight last year but had only 16 days in orbit to try them out.

Good weather was forecast for Friday's late morning landing attempt with the rain expected to hold off until afternoon at NASA's spaceport.

On Thursday afternoon, NASA cleared Endeavour to come home, after analysing wing and nose images beamed down by the crew Wednesday in one final sweep for micrometeorite damage.

"I'm ready to get back ... I think I have a landing in me, so don't want to get anybody on the ground worried about that," commander Mark Polansky told the AP.

In one of NASA's longer shuttle flights, Polansky and his crew put a new addition onto the international space station - a porch for Japan's massive UA$1 billion (NZ$1.5 billion) lab - and freshened up the place with batteries, experiments and spare parts. They rocketed into space July 15.

Thursday marked Day 15 in space for Polansky and all but one of his crew. For Wakata, Thursday marked day 137. He flew to the space station back in March, becoming the first person from Japan to live at the orbiting outpost.
Ad Feedback

Wakata said he's longing for sushi.

"That's the first thing that I'd like to have and also a hot spring in Japan sometime in the near future," Wakata told the AP.
love nuts, no thank you lol!

Question #7:

Can someone help me find this book? It's Sci-fi, and I read it like 10 years ago?

The book is about some kid, who gets taken by an alien to a spaceship, and they implant this thing into his head so he can speak the language that all the aliens speak, because it sounds like English to him. He has an alien friend throughout the book, and there is a machine that takes his clothes, and like sanitizes them, and then another machine that allows him to put anything he wants in his room, furniture wise, as well as he can eat what he wants, and all that.

It's like a kids book, and it's primarily about aliens, and this trip he takes, which may or may not be a permanent one, I'm not sure if he gets to go home.

You guys found the movie Flight of the Navigator, don't let me down!!!

Question #8:

How can I make this flow?

I wrote this, but I want it to go together better. Any suggestions?

On July 20, 1960, the Apollo 11 was the first spaceship to land on the moon. It was the fifth flight of project Apollo. Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin were the first humans to step on the moon. “That's one small step for man, one giant leap for mankind,” is a famous quote Neil Armstrong said. After this, going into space has begun happening more and more. This all happened because John F. Kennedy made a goal to go into space by the end of the 1960’s.
Can you help me to reword it to make it sound better (less like a textbook and more poetic?)

Question #9:

Name of this childrens movie?

i loved this movie so much as a kid i watched it over to the point where the tape was ruined from watching it too much.. no one in my family remembers what its called. but its stuck with me...

what i do recall of it is...

*it would of been out late 80s early 90's
*was about a little boy who moved house? or ran away?.. or ran outside to play...
* found a bunch of 'aliens' in his shed?
*the aliens were small not ur typical aliens... they were big enough to hold.. and one looked like a ticktac and like changed shape and they could talk to him
*the child helped them find thier space ship and get back home.. i rem the spaceship was crashed in the bush and he had to help them fix it before a certain time?
*it was a CARTOON

like I said, I was a little kid when I saw this so my memory of it is very fauge..thanks in advance... if anyone knows it, i will love you forever lol! its been bugging me for years!!!!!!!!

its not

ET
mac and me
flight of the navigators
batteries not included
glitterball
its been bugging me for so long.. i know there was also a time limit as to when they needed to get back to thier planet but i cant remember why?

Question #10:

Looking for a series of books, probably in childrens' SF...?

This is really for the older ones out there since these books date back to the 60s (possibly earlier). They're British (I think) and feature a series of space flights to other plants with alliterative titles like "Mission to Mercury", "Spaceship to Saturn", "Journey to Jupiter", etc. I can't remember the author's name but I think he had "Dr" in front of it. (And before anyone asks, no I haven't been able to trace any of these on ebay or the internet generally.)

Question #11:

What do you think? Funny Paper I just wrote for my Advanced Comp class..?

*Disclosure: The writer can not be held responsible for the outcome of following these instructions because he has no knowledge of the subject and is completely full of crap.

Although the concept of constructing a homemade spaceship may initially seem difficult and overwhelming, the process is really quite easy to follow. In the words of Sherlock Holmes, "Watson, it's really quite elementary." Before attempting to build the craft, you need to procure all of the necessary materials. The next step in the process, after you have everything you need, is to draw up the schematics so that you have a plan to follow. Once your plans are complete, you can begin to build the ship's interior frame. At this point, you must cover the fuselage with a protective skin. Now that the plane itself is finished, the final step is to install the rocket boosters. Pay close attention as I describe these steps more precisely, because only if they are followed properly will you have a spacecraft capable of flight.

As any experienced rocket scientist will tell you, building a good spaceship begins with using quality materials. Unfortunately, however, these materials are not available at the same location. Despite this inconvenience, they can usually be obtained by making as few as three stops. Elmer's glue and Duct tape can be easily obtained, for minimal cost, in the craft department at your local Wal-Mart. These two ingredients are an essential part of the building process. They are used to bond the parts of the craft together. The next place you will have to go is the nearest dump. This is usually the cheapest location to procure the cardboard boxes and wood you will need. At least 1,000 refrigerator-sized cardboard boxes and several thousand 2x4s will be necessary to properly construct the fuselage . It is now finally time to find the last two parts you will need. Unless you happen to have 100 tons of high-grade rocket fuel and rocket boosters sitting around in your garage, you will need to use the Internet to find them. The best place to find these materials on-line is the Soviet Cold War Recyclables Auction House. Due to recent oversight by the Department of Homeland Security, I am unable to relay to you the web address for SCWRAH. Don't let this stop you though. A quick visit to Google should help you find what you need. Be careful when you're waiting for the delivery because the box is usually labeled as "Sneakers," and you don't want your mom to discover your rocket fuel sitting on the front porch. You'll also need a ruler and something to write with. Other things you may need: a utility knife, a hammer, and several hundred boxes of nails. Now that you have everything in one spot, you are ready to build your ship.

In order to begin construction, you must first know what the heck you're going to build. If you don't know what a space shuttle looks like, you can find a picture on-line or at a nearby library. This step is the easiest one in the process. All that you need to do is draw a quick sketch of your ship using a ruler and some crayons. Be creative! Always remember one thing: This isn't rocket science! If you want, you can even draw a little cosmonaut in the corner for fun. When your sketch is finished, you are ready to start construction.

Begin by laying out your 2x4s in the shape of the ship you drew. It's not important if it looks exactly like the sketch. It doesn't need to be perfect. When you have the boards laid out the way you want them, it's time to connect them using the Elmer's glue and Duct tape you bought earlier. Simply add a bit of the glue anywhere the 2x4s touch each other and wait for it to dry. When the glue has hardened, wrap the tape around it for added support. When this step is completed, you must cover the frame to protect it from thing damaging effects of space travel.

To produce the external cover, you must use your utility knife to cut the cardboard into smaller pieces to fit onto the frame. If a section is too large for one piece of cardboard, simply use your Duct tape to tape several pieces together. When the sections are cut appropriately, the time has come to attach them to the frame. Simply use the hammer to pound some nails through the cardboard and into the wooden planks that make up the frame. If, when your shell is complete, the craft is wobbly or at all unstable, simply add extra nails. Like I always say: When in doubt, use more nails. Your fuselage is now complete, but a spaceship without rockets is like a car without a motor. Let's move on to the final step. It's time to add the boosters.

You must be extra careful removing the rocket boosters from the packaging they arrived in, as they are usually already filled with fuel. If the Soviets sent you extra fuel, it is most likely in several hundred milk jugs. It is very important that before you begin attaching the boosters, you properly store the fuel tanks. If you have a large enough back yard, simply bury

Question #12:

Will The Speed of Light ever be obtained by Man .....?

Nothing ever happens if no one thinks about it. People didn't fly until someone thought and thought and eventually worked out the Mechanics of Flight. Hence Rockets and Spaceships. Do you think the People of Earth will ever go the route of Star Trek and Star Wars?

All answers are welcome. Thank you!
Excellent! Thank you!
I'm so confused! I have no idea which is the best answer! All of you sound incredibly smart! I'll think about it for another 24 hours. (smiling)

Question #13:

Will The Speed of Light ever be obtained by Man .....?

Question #14:

Trying to remember a name of a movie, I think from the 80s.?

Recently I've been having movie nights at home with my three young children, big bowl and popcorn and all. I've been trying to find movies that we can watch together that I enjoyed as a kid. We've rented Labyrinth, Flight of the Navigator, and many others. But there is this one I remember that I loved, but can't remember what it was called.

In the movie I remember that there were these boys, they built a spaceship out of a garbage can and other trash that flew. They met a couple of comedic aliens, I believe one was a real girly girl alien. I remember there being a lot of music but it wasn't a musical.
I can't remember much more than that and was wondering if anyone knew which movie I was talking about. I would appreciate it!

And if anyone has any other good suggestions that I have forgotten about, preferably from the 80s or early 90s, that would be awesome.

Question #15:

Name of this old school Childrens movie?!!!!!!!!!!!!?

Question #16:

What is the name of movie before "flight of the navigator"one about some kids finding a small round spaceship

In this movie the space ship was a round ball, once inside the law of inertia was negated so the ball could move at the speed of light and turn or stop or reverse directions without affecting the kids inside. I saw this movie at a drive-in movie theater just before "Flight of the Navigator" was released and haven't been able to locate it since then. I would like to know the name of this movie if anyone can help me.

Question #17:

What would you do if Paris Hilton died in Sub-Orbital flight?

I just found out that Paris Hilton was one of the 200 people to deposit $20,000 and reserve a seat on Virgin Galactic's SpaceShip 2.

What would you do if Paris Hilton died in Sub-Orbital flight?

Question #18:

When you were a kid, weren't you expecting to go to rock concerts on the moon by now?

"Every night is a different flight to a different galaxy
Do a sold-out show, then I hit the road in my starship limousine

Get so damned tired and uninspired doin' all these one night stands
It's a giant leap for Rock'n'Roll...but it's too much for just one man

I'm a Spaceship Superstar... gotta solar-powered laser beam guitar
I'm at the top of all the charts on Mars...I'm a Spaceship Superstar!

On Mercury, they're crazy about my stellar rock'n'roll
And I always sell out in advance at the Martian Astrobowl

The fans, they swarm like meteorites to our concerts on the moon
You should have seen us knock'em dead on Venus doin' all our favorite tunes

I'm a Spaceship Superstar...gotta solar-powered laser beam guitar
I'm at the top of all the charts on Mars...I'm a Spaceship Superstar!"

Click Here

Question #19:

Why do people who support NASA assume that if you do not support it, that you are against space travel?

It's like they completely omit SpaceShip One and the LONG TERM POTENTIAL of commercial space flight.
John B, people said that no one would even go to suborbital space through commercial space flight and you also ignore how there was no heated reentry with SpaceShip One simply due to the feathered configuration.

Question #20:

Is High Technology In the Bible?

There are readers out there who would be surprised or offended with the notion that high-technology was described in the Bible. There are other readers who have realized that the only explanations to Biblical mysteries are ancient Close Encounters. A good question is: Why are certain, Old Testament events written about in the Bible? The answer could be that these were special events between basically two groups of people: One group was the primitives or the general state of humanity in Biblical times. The other group was the relatively few HUMANS that still retained and utilized technology originating from the days of Atlantis.

When angels made an appearance, they were always human. Those who caused the Great Flood; gave Moses the instructions on building the Ark of the Covenant; and warned Lot then destroyed Sodom and Gomorrah...were human beings. But, these people had advanced knowledge and flew 'chariots' in the sky. They resided on the tops of mountains; well away from the simple world of Bible prophets in the lowlands.

The most amazing example of an Old Testament Close Encounter is the Book of Ezekiel. Read the beginning of Chapter 1 in the King James Bible...only imagine that it is a UFO landing. With this idea in mind, Ezekiel's experience is almost understandable. Ezekiel's Book was so controversial that it nearly did not survive the religious editors who did throw out the Book of Enoch.

'The Spaceships of Ezekiel' by Blumrich is an award-winning book that should be read by anyone investigating Biblical mysteries. Blumrich is a scientist and NASA designer of the Saturn V rocket. He wrote that his son informed him, after reading an Erich Von Daniken book, that the prophet Ezekiel described a spaceship landing. Blumrich was positive that he could disprove that concept because of his technical skills in this field. The ancient text could not possibly portray a feasible craft; he assumed. The NASA designer wrote that he was never so surprised when he actually read the Book of Ezekiel. The ancient words did indeed conform to a realistic vehicle.

In the beginning of Ezekiel, the prophet wrote of the approach of four faces from above. In reality, the 'four' referred to the landing legs of the craft. Blumrich was shocked when he read the Old Testament report of 'straight legs' of 'burnished brass' with 'round feet.' The NASA scientist himself designed the metallic, straight legs and round footpads of the lunar lander. The famous quote from Ezekiel is 'a wheel within a wheel.' Once the lander touched down, Ezekiel saw wheels. This is the exact chronology of what would occur with a modern vehicle. The UFO landed, transformed into a wheeled rover then rolled along the ground. Ezekiel was only familiar with wheels from simple carts that moved in one direction. But, the prophet described wheels that moved in all directions which was completely alien to Ezekiel.

Enoch was Methuselah's father and Noah's grandfather. His Book should be in the Old Testament. It has surfaced from independent sources which validate the ancient text. The Book of Enoch was edited out of the Bible by the Ecumenical Council for its controversies. Enoch, like Ezekiel, was taken on many flights by the gods (angels) and witnessed great horrors and beauty. 39/3: '...a whirlwind carried me off from the earth...' There are numerous references to whirlwinds which 'spirited' Enoch away into the sky. The angels 'showed me all the hidden things' and 'mine eyes saw all the secret things of heaven.' Enoch saw views that 'no man shall see.' In 33/4, Enoch states: 'I saw a great and glorious device.'

32/2: 'And thence I went over the summits of the earth, and passed above the Erythraean Sea, and went far from it, and passed over the angel Zotiel (another ship?).

14/18-19: 'I looked and saw a lofty throne: its appearance was as crystal and the wheels thereof as the shining sun...from underneath the throne came streams of flaming fire so great that I could not look thereon.' Enoch mentions crystals and wheels. The throne could be a vehicle where the angels sat and underneath were fires from the rocket thrusters. The 'vision caused me to fly and lifted me upward and bore me into heaven.'

There are numerous references to PORTALS or windows where Earthly and celestial views appeared. 33/2: '...portals of the heaven open. 3. And I saw how the stars of heaven come forth.'

The Book of Enoch speaks of much destruction, chaos and corruption on Earth; as well as among the angels. Like Genesis, Enoch mentions 'giants' and 'the Watchers.' There were 'the Satans' - the 'Sons of Heaven' - 'angels of punishment' - 'instruments of Satan' - and the same specific Genesis angels: Michael, Raphael, Gabriel, etc. 'God' is never mentioned; only plural gods or angels. Enoch was taken to the mountaintops where the gods resided. He observed things that no primitive could understand. The angels 'corrupted the sons of man.' It was these various humans, with the technology, that played God and decided the fate of the children on Earth.

The main reason Enoch's Book was deemed heresy and taken out of the Old Testament could have been the accurate astronomy. Page after page concerns the sun, moon, yearly cycles and heavenly statistics. 'Paths of the sun and moon,' 'their stately orbits,' 'courses of the luminaries' and 'revolve in their circular chariots' are only a few quotes of Enochian wisdom.

75/8: 'And I saw in the heaven running in the world, above those portals in which revolve the stars that never set.' Only from space are there stars that never set. Remember, the Church during the time of Ecumenical editing condemned accurate astronomy. (Ask Galileo). Religious officials wanted the public to think that the Earth was flat, did not move and was in the center of all things.

During these ancient times, there were mad scientists (angel-demons) who cloned anything they wanted. The mythological animals were real; they were genetic experiments. Also, wars of the gods occurred. Nuclear warfare was not beyond the capability of the angels. Robert Oppenheimer, creator of modern atomics and a student of early books of India, knew that nuclear wars happened in the Old World. The deserts of today are the result of ancient, atomic wars. Assuming that these conclusions are true: The Great Flood was probably green-lighted by good gods who wanted to reduce high radiation levels. Also...the perverted creatures and their power-crazed, genetic engineers needed to be eliminated on a global scale. The Earth was a mess and needed to be wiped clean.

There was a Great Flood that covered all of the land. Sea shells were found on top of Mount Everest. There is water erosion on the Sphinx. All land is a sedimentary deposit. Many Noahs sailed during Waterworld. The Chinese have their old stories of an Ark and a Great Deluge. Numerous indian cultures have their legends of a Flood, a Noah and an Ark.

Most people do not believe in the Biblical story of Noah because of a basic problem: How could a few people gather ALL the animals, feed and care for them on board a ship for months? The answer comes from...who controlled the Earth thousands of years ago? The angels (the humans with the technology) built the Arks, collected the animals and caused the rains. The chosen animals were probably the best examples of their specie and worthy of being saved. It is scientifically possible to place a life form in suspended animation reduced down to its DNA. This was the cargo within the Arks. The samples of DNA would be revived, later, after the waters receded. Nowhere in the Bible does it mention that Noah went out and gathered each animal. It only says Noah brought them into the Ark. If the 'life cannisters' were all assembled for the Noahs by the gods and the simple people merely carried them in and secured them in place, then this does explain the Noah story.

The world began again. In Genesis, it says that after the Flood: Noah went to live with the 'gods.' This was one of the few plural references that survived the editors of the Bible. The reference 'gods' was later changed to the singular 'God.' The simplified term was changed to accommodate a world that had become extremely simple.

Atlantis was Eden. Compare these two legends. Each was our mother-civilization or the place where we originated. Each was a Paradise. Each fell and mankind had to leave in disgrace.

It is not far-fetched how the people of Earth could divide itself into two races; a simple one and a complex one. If a nuclear war happened today, the survivors would continue in tribal communities. After generations, they would forget what technology was. But, the few who knew of the coming nuclear devastation and even caused it...would have protected themselves and be the few who still possess advanced knowledge. These 'gods' could deal with the numerous primitives as they saw fit. This concept is ancient history.

The Genesis story of the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah is not a mystery when you plug in the idea of a modern technology. How do two cities, realistically, get wiped off the face of the Earth? The inhabitants of Hiroshima and Nagasaki may know the answer. Two, human angels came into town and warned people of the coming destruction:

19/17: '...Escape for thy life; look not behind thee, neither stay thou in all the plain; escape to the mountain, lest thou be consumed.'
19/24: 'Then the Lord rained upon Sodom and Gomorrah brimstone and fire from the Lord out of heaven.'
19/26: 'But his wife looked back from behind, and she became a pillar of salt.'
19/28: '...the smoke of the country went up as the smoke of a furnace.'
19/30: '...he (Lot) feared to dwell in Zoar: and he dwelt in a cave, he and his two daughters.'
The angels directed Lot and his family to save their lives by running to the mountain. A land mass can protect one from a nuclear blast. The cities were 'consumed' with 'brimstone and fire.' This is a perfect description of a nuking. A mushroom cloud moving vertically could be the meaning of 'went up as the smoke of a furnace.' Lot's wife did not make it; not because she looked back, but because she trailed 'behind' the rest of her family. A primitive seeing an atomic explosion would be more than stunned; they would tend to stop in their tracks. Not looking back is good advice to those running for their lives. The 'pillar of salt' could have come from finding her body later and discovering the effects of radiation. Finally, hiding in a 'cave' because of the fall-out until the land was ready for habitation is very logical.

Genesis 1/26: 'And God said, let us make man in our image, after our likeness...'
2/21: 'And the Lord God caused a deep sleep to fall upon Adam, and he slept: and he took one of his ribs, and closed up the flesh...'
In Genesis 1/26, there are important clues that the creation of Eve from Adam was not conducted by a singular God. In this one sentence, there are three plural references: 'us,' 'our' and 'our.'
This was a CLONING operation observed by a primitive who did not understand. First, one of the technicians caused Adam to fall into a 'deep sleep.' This was the anesthesia. Second, a cell must be taken from somewhere on the body to create another body. The rib area was where the cell was taken. They 'closed up the flesh' is a modern expression describing the completion of the operation. Master-cloners could quickly form an adult and change the sex from the original. This idea was illustrated in a Star Trek Next Generation episode where a primitive was brought back to life and mistook Captain Picard as a god. He prayed to 'the Picard' and was later corrected.

Before the Red Sea parted, there were two UFOs leading the people out of Egypt. Exodus 13/21: 'And the Lord went before them by day in a pillar of a cloud, to lead them away; and by night in a pillar of fire, to give them light; to go by day and night.' These objects in the sky could very well be spacecraft when you consider: clouds (or smoke) by day and fire by night. Rocket thrusters could create billowing smoke in sunlight. But, at night, the flames from the propulsion systems would be what was mainly visible. These chariots in the air could have held back the waters of the Red Sea with forcefields.

Exodus 14/22: 'And the children of Israel went into the midst of the sea upon dry ground: and the waters were a wall (on either side).' With a flick of a switch. turning off the forcefield at the appropriate time, the 'waters returned, and covered the chariots' of the Egyptians.

All through Exodus, this Lord God demands that 'I am the Lord' and 'I will be to you a God: and ye shall know that I am the Lord, your God.' In 15/3, there is a strange reference: 'The Lord is a man of war.' This is curious because it says God is a 'man' and not a very nice one. It is more like God is a big bully; having power over people; pushing his weight around only because he has the ability to do so.

There is a warning in 19/12 to 'go not up into the mount, or touch the border of it: whosoever toucheth the mount shall be surely put to death.' This Biblical God was not God. 19/18: 'And mount Sinai was altogether on a smoke, because the Lord descended upon it in fire...and the whole mount quaked greatly.'

In Exodus, Moses was given instructions on building the Ark of the Covenant. The inventive genius, Nikola Tesla, wrote in 'The Wall of Light' that Moses had to have been a skilled electrical engineer. The Ark, Tesla concluded, was a very powerful 'condenser.' It created intense vibrations that could smash solid stone. The Israelites carted the device into battle and won wars with it; not unlike the vibration weapons the Fremen used in the film 'Dune.'

I Samuel 14/5: 'And when the Ark of the Covenant of the Lord came into the camp, all Israel shouted with a great shout...' 4/8: '...who shall deliver us out of the hand of these mighty Gods? these are the Gods that smote the Egyptians...'

In II Samuel 6/6-7...a simple man named Uzzah, disregarded warnings, touched the Ark improperly and was electrocuted! '...Uzzah put forth his hand to the ark of God, and took hold of it; for the oxen shook it. And the anger of the Lord was kindled against Uzzah; and God smote him there for his error; and there he died by the ark of God.' The man attempted to place it back on the ox-drawn cart and died. They had no concept of high-voltage. 6/9: 'And David was afraid of the Lord that day.'

The story of Jericho is told in the Book of Joshua. The actual site of Jericho was found. The stone walls were over ten feet thick. What could bring down massive walls? According to the Old Testament, it was the power of the Lord. Marching around the stone fort and blowing trumpets could not possibly shatter such walls. The Ark of the Covenant was there and responsible for 'tumbling down' the walls of Jericho. There are numerous references to, again, a great shout.

Jonah was taken aboard a submarine. But, the prophets would not have that modern word; so the description became a 'great fish.' How were the 10 Commandments cut into stone? The finger of God could have accomplished this if they were lasers. The burning bush may have been electric. The Virgin Mary could have been artificially inseminated.

The Biblical reports were not understood 500 years ago or even 100 years ago. It was only until the 20th Century and its technology that we could finally understand what was really happening. There is evidence that our REAL prehistory was similar to science-fiction. Most people either reject the Bible as nonsense or believe it is the absolute word of the Supreme Being. The Bible is the most amazing account of Close Encounters. The events were real; they happened; but the truth is extraordinary.

** Powered by Yahoo Answers